[E-trademarks] TM search bar

Kevin Grierson kgrierson at cm.law
Tue Oct 1 14:21:04 UTC 2024


Thanks for the clarification!

Kevin Grierson​​​​
|
Partner
[cid:image001.png at 01DB13EB.9EBE1020]
[Mobile:]
  757-726-7799<tel:757-726-7799>
[Fax:]
  866-521-5663<fax:866-521-5663>
[Email:]
  kgrierson at cm.law<mailto:kgrierson at cm.law>
Please note: Culhane Meadows is now CM Law

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com> On Behalf Of Edward Timberlake via E-trademarks
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2024 10:16 AM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: Edward Timberlake <ed at timberlakelaw.com>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] TM search bar

EXTERNAL EMAIL
*search terms don't all need to be in lowercase


Sincerely,

Ed Timberlake
Board Certified Specialist in Trademark Law<https://www.nclawspecialists.gov/for-the-public/find-a-board-certified-specialist/results/detail/?id=29473>

Timberlake Law<http://timberlakelaw.com/>
Chapel Hill, NC

Schedule a call on Clarity<https://clarity.fm/edtimberlake>
ed at timberlakelaw.com<mailto:ed at timberlakelaw.com>
919.960.1950

[https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/mail-sig/AIorK4zUm0zjuSoSf91b85RXakFjrbAqMcNkJek2_S8VO9eHNz9mDAX5u3RBN0aEhVODltVLqRN-NYsDzt7A]






On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 9:55 AM Kevin Grierson via E-trademarks <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>> wrote:
I have definitely done that before.  All field tags and logic operators need to be in all caps; all search terms need to be in lowercase.

Kevin Grierson​​​​
|
Partner
[cid:image001.png at 01DB13EB.9EBE1020]
[Mobile:]
  757-726-7799<tel:757-726-7799>
[Fax:]
  866-521-5663
[Email:]
  kgrierson at cm.law<mailto:kgrierson at cm.law>
Please note: Culhane Meadows is now CM Law

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> On Behalf Of James E. Lake via E-trademarks
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 8:32 PM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: James E. Lake <jel at randalldanskin.com<mailto:jel at randalldanskin.com>>
Subject: Re: [E-trademarks] TM search bar

EXTERNAL EMAIL
Great, thank you. I missed that line in the instructions.

James Lake

From: Kevin Grierson <kgrierson at cm.law<mailto:kgrierson at cm.law>>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 4:56 PM
To: For trademark practitioners. This is not for laypersons to seek legal advice. <e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>>
Cc: James E. Lake <jel at randalldanskin.com<mailto:jel at randalldanskin.com>>
Subject: RE: TM search bar


[External Email]
You need to capitalize AND NOT.  If you do that, you’ll cut your results down to 1080.

Kevin Grierson​​​​
|
Partner
[cid:image001.png at 01DB13EB.9EBE1020]
[Mobile:]
  757-726-7799<tel:757-726-7799>
[Fax:]
  866-521-5663
[Email:]
  kgrierson at cm.law<mailto:kgrierson at cm.law>
Please note: Culhane Meadows is now CM Law

From: E-trademarks <e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks-bounces at oppedahl-lists.com>> On Behalf Of James E. Lake via E-trademarks
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 7:23 PM
To: e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:e-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
Cc: James E. Lake <jel at randalldanskin.com<mailto:jel at randalldanskin.com>>
Subject: [E-trademarks] TM search bar

EXTERNAL EMAIL
I am new to this group, so this topic may have already been addressed.

Has anyone else noticed the “andnot” Boolean operator at https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/search/search-information appears to be programmed incorrectly? Per https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/help, “Use AND NOT if results must satisfy the first search term but not the second. For example, CM:*USPTO* AND NOT DC:* retrieves marks where the literal element of the mark includes USPTO and there are no design search codes.” However, it does not always work that way.

For the search query
AT: "john smith"~3
I get 1,402 results.
For the narrowed search query
AT: "john smith"~3 andnot AT: hill
I get 27,181 results. Something seems very wrong here. As I understand it, the second search must necessarily yield the same or fewer results.

If I use the “and not” (with a space) operator from the USPTO instructions, instead of the more typical “andnot” (no space) operator, then I get over 9,000,000 results!

James Lake
--
E-trademarks mailing list
E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com<mailto:E-trademarks at oppedahl-lists.com>
http://oppedahl-lists.com/mailman/listinfo/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241001/f92123f9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5049 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241001/f92123f9/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 285 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241001/f92123f9/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 452 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241001/f92123f9/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 394 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://oppedahl-lists.com/pipermail/e-trademarks_oppedahl-lists.com/attachments/20241001/f92123f9/attachment-0003.png>


More information about the E-trademarks mailing list