May 2024 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed May 1 16:11:27 EDT 2024
Ending: Thu May 30 15:23:56 EDT 2024
Messages: 226

• [E-trademarks] [E-trademarks-L] SMART-DOCKET.COM   Richard Morris
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Re: Use in commerce   Alex Butterman
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Re: Use in commerce   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Re: Use in commerce   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Re: Use in commerce   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Timing of Cancellation of Mark After Abandonment   Alex Butterman
• [E-trademarks] [EXT] Timing of Cancellation of Mark After Abandonment   John L. Welch
• [E-trademarks] [EXTERNAL] TSDR Woes   Keller, Scott
• [E-trademarks] ABA ethics opinion on case hypotheticals on listservs   Katherine Markert
• [E-trademarks] ABA ethics opinion on case hypotheticals on listservs   Richard Morris
• [E-trademarks] ABA ethics opinion on case hypotheticals on listservs   Emil Ali
• [E-trademarks] ABA ethics opinion on case hypotheticals on listservs   Michael D. Steger
• [E-trademarks] ABA ethics opinion on case hypotheticals on listservs   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] ABA ethics opinion on case hypotheticals on listservs   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] Acceptable Specimens for Name of a Character in a Creative Work?   Spencer Cross
• [E-trademarks] Another scam - trademarkproharbours.com   Jessica R. Friedman
• [E-trademarks] Another scam - trademarkproharbours.com   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Anyone else having problems with TSDR?   O'Connell Jr., Robert
• [E-trademarks] Anyone else having problems with TSDR?   Martin, Winfield B. (Perkins Coie)
• [E-trademarks] Anyone else having problems with TSDR?   Rick Bigelow
• [E-trademarks] Anyone else having problems with TSDR?   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] a paralegal looking for part-time work   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Cancellation of a cited registration   mary harris
• [E-trademarks] Challenge Examiner's Reliance on Non-U.S. Websites   Steve Zemanick
• [E-trademarks] Challenge Examiner's Reliance on Non-U.S. Websites   Janet Satterthwaite
• [E-trademarks] Challenge Examiner's Reliance on Non-U.S. Websites   Richard Schafer
• [E-trademarks] Challenge Examiner's Reliance on Non-U.S. Websites   Orvis
• [E-trademarks] Challenge Examiner's Reliance on Non-U.S. Websites   Robert Pierce
• [E-trademarks] Challenge Examiner's Reliance on Non-U.S. Websites   Paul Reidl
• [E-trademarks] Challenge Examiner's Reliance on Non-U.S. Websites   Ed Welch
• [E-trademarks] Correcting a typo dates of first use   Maria Eliseeva
• [E-trademarks] Correcting a typo dates of first use   Simor Moskowitz
• [E-trademarks] Correcting a typo dates of first use   Heather Vargas
• [E-trademarks] Corsearch sending takedown notices for TM infringement: How is this not UPL?   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Corsearch sending takedown notices for TM infringement: How is this not UPL?   Lindsey Corbin
• [E-trademarks] Corsearch sending takedown notices for TM infringement: How is this not UPL?   trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Corsearch sending takedown notices for TM infringement: How is this not UPL?   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Corsearch sending takedown notices for TM infringement: How is this not UPL?   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Corsearch sending takedown notices for TM infringement: How is this not UPL?   trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Corsearch sending takedown notices for TM infringement: How is this not UPL?   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Corsearch sending takedown notices for TM infringement: How is this not UPL?   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] damages experts   Janet Satterthwaite
• [E-trademarks] Discouraging work   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Discouraging work   Dan Feigelson
• [E-trademarks] Discouraging work   Leesa N. Weiss
• [E-trademarks] Discouraging work   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Discouraging work   Rick Stempkovski
• [E-trademarks] e-Trademarks reception went well   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Estimates for survey to be conducted to determine distinctiveness of trade dress   Leesa N. Weiss
• [E-trademarks] Estimates for survey to be conducted to determine distinctiveness of trade dress   daniel at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Estimates for survey to be conducted to determine distinctiveness of trade dress   Leesa N. Weiss
• [E-trademarks] Estimates for survey to be conducted to determine distinctiveness of trade dress   Janet Satterthwaite
• [E-trademarks] Estimates for survey to be conducted to determine distinctiveness of trade dress   Leesa N. Weiss
• [E-trademarks] ESTTA glitchy   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Examiner using applicant company's owner's uses of the mark as evidence of descriptiveness.   Gordon Firemark
• [E-trademarks] Examiner using applicant company's owner's uses of the mark as evidence of descriptiveness.   daniel at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Female Rage: The Musical (yes, this is a posting to the TM Listserv)   Jessica R. Friedman
• [E-trademarks] Female Rage: The Musical (yes, this is a posting to the TM Listserv)   Janet Satterthwaite
• [E-trademarks] Female Rage: The Musical (yes, this is a posting to the TM Listserv)   Jessica R. Friedman
• [E-trademarks] Female Rage: The Musical (yes, this is a posting to the TM Listserv)   Edward Timberlake
• [E-trademarks] Filing one application in one class, but listing some goods as actual use and some as intent to use   Dale Quisenberry
• [E-trademarks] Filing one application in one class, but listing some goods as actual use and some as intent to use   Orvis
• [E-trademarks] Filing one application in one class, but listing some goods as actual use and some as intent to use   Lindsey Corbin
• [E-trademarks] Filing one application in one class, but listing some goods as actual use and some as intent to use   Michael Brown
• [E-trademarks] Filing one application in one class, but listing some goods as actual use and some as intent to use   Dale Quisenberry
• [E-trademarks] FW: Notice of potential erroneous release of patent application titles   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] FW: Notice of potential erroneous release of patent application titles   David Boundy
• [E-trademarks] FW: Off List Referral - Please & Thank You   Rick Stempkovski
• [E-trademarks] Fwd: Notice of Data Security Incident   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Fwd: Notice of Data Security Incident   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Fwd: Notice of Data Security Incident   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Job Platforms Allowing Scam "Recruiters"   Janice Housey
• [E-trademarks] Job Platforms Allowing Scam "Recruiters"   trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Job Platforms Allowing Scam "Recruiters"   Thilo C. Agthe
• [E-trademarks] Job Platforms Allowing Scam "Recruiters"   Desai, Anuj
• [E-trademarks] Job Platforms Allowing Scam "Recruiters"   Janice Housey
• [E-trademarks] Job Platforms Allowing Scam "Recruiters"   trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Job Platforms Allowing Scam "Recruiters"   Dmitriy Makarov
• [E-trademarks] Job Platforms Allowing Scam "Recruiters"   trachtenbergm at gtlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Legal Contacts at LinkedIn   Ellen Lockwood
• [E-trademarks] Let's try to collect all of our Assignment Center bugs   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Let's try to collect all of our Assignment Center bugs   Patti Giuliano
• [E-trademarks] moot versus without prejudice?   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] moot versus without prejudice?   daniel at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] More glitches in the matrix at the PTO?   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] More glitches in the matrix at the PTO?   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] More SOU follies   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] More USPTO Notice Weirdness   Greg William
• [E-trademarks] More USPTO Notice Weirdness   jack baldinilaw.com
• [E-trademarks] More USPTO Notice Weirdness   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Most succinct C&D response   Jessica R. Friedman
• [E-trademarks] Most succinct C&D response   Michael D. Steger
• [E-trademarks] Most succinct C&D response   Jessica R. Friedman
• [E-trademarks] Most succinct C&D response   Jessica R. Friedman
• [E-trademarks] Most succinct C&D response   Simor Moskowitz
• [E-trademarks] Most succinct C&D response   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] Most succinct C&D response   Stendell, Leanne
• [E-trademarks] Most succinct C&D response   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] Multiple SOU Acceptance Notices   Greg William
• [E-trademarks] Multiple SOU Acceptance Notices   barbara friedman
• [E-trademarks] Multiple SOU Acceptance Notices   Rebecca Westers
• [E-trademarks] Need this case, please: In re Dixie Rest. Inc., 105 USPQ2d 1753 (TTAB 2013).   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] Need TM Counsel in UK and NZ to file applications   Michael D. Steger
• [E-trademarks] New, very targeted, very early scam - a sort of spearphishing.   Laura Geyer
• [E-trademarks] New, very targeted, very early scam - a sort of spearphishing.   Chelsie Spencer
• [E-trademarks] New, very targeted, very early scam - a sort of spearphishing.   Maria Crimi Speth
• [E-trademarks] New, very targeted, very early scam - a sort of spearphishing.   Tom Vanderbloemen
• [E-trademarks] New, very targeted, very early scam - a sort of spearphishing.   Heather Vargas
• [E-trademarks] New, very targeted, very early scam - a sort of spearphishing.   Laura Geyer
• [E-trademarks] New, very targeted, very early scam - a sort of spearphishing.   Chelsie Spencer
• [E-trademarks] Notice of Data Security Incident   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Notice of Data Security Incident   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] Notice of Data Security Incident   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Notice of Data Security Incident   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Notice of Data Security Incident   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Off-List Referral for Law Firm in Taiwan   Katherine Markert
• [E-trademarks] Office Action Asserts Not Enough Class Fees Paid   Orvis
• [E-trademarks] Office Action Asserts Not Enough Class Fees Paid   Simor Moskowitz
• [E-trademarks] Office Action Asserts Not Enough Class Fees Paid   Orvis PC
• [E-trademarks] Office Action Asserts Not Enough Class Fees Paid   Orvis PC
• [E-trademarks] Office Action Asserts Not Enough Class Fees Paid   Ronni Jillions
• [E-trademarks] Off List Referral - Please & Thank You   Rick Stempkovski
• [E-trademarks] Off Topic - Fractional GC   David Lizerbram
• [E-trademarks] One dollar to get to the Atlanta airport   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] OT - Referral for Oklahoma City real estate lawyer   Heather Vargas
• [E-trademarks] paralegals that think they are smarter than lawyers   Orvis PC
• [E-trademarks] paralegals that think they are smarter than lawyers   Simor Moskowitz
• [E-trademarks] paralegals that think they are smarter than lawyers   Orvis PC
• [E-trademarks] paralegals that think they are smarter than lawyers   Orvis PC
• [E-trademarks] Petition for Certiorari - Chestek PLLC v. Vidal   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Petition for Certiorari - Chestek PLLC v. Vidal   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] Petition for Certiorari - Chestek PLLC v. Vidal   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Petition to Director for entity with no physical address   mary harris
• [E-trademarks] Petition to Director for entity with no physical address   Julia Anne Matheson
• [E-trademarks] Photo from Listserv reception   doug at giga.law
• [E-trademarks] Photo from Listserv reception (with link only)   doug at giga.law
• [E-trademarks] Photo from Listserv reception (with link only)   Daliah Saper
• [E-trademarks] Photo from Listserv reception (with link only)   Doug Isenberg
• [E-trademarks] Photo from Listserv reception (with link only)   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] Re-filed a previously approved ITU application, now refused?   Gordon Firemark
• [E-trademarks] Re-filed a previously approved ITU application, now refused?   Heather Vargas
• [E-trademarks] Re-filed a previously approved ITU application, now refused?   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Re-filed a previously approved ITU application, now refused?   Simor Moskowitz
• [E-trademarks] Re-filed a previously approved ITU application, now refused?   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] Re-filed a previously approved ITU application, now refused?   daniel at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Recent Registration Date Processing Change?   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Recent Registration Date Processing Change?   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Recent Registration Date Processing Change?   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] Recent Registration Date Processing Change?   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Recordal question   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] Recordal question   mary harris
• [E-trademarks] Recordal question   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] Recordal question   daniel at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Recordal question   Ramon G. Vela Cordova
• [E-trademarks] Referral needed North Carolina   Richard Morris
• [E-trademarks] Referral Off-List: Certified Spanish Language Translators for a Contract   Ahad Syed
• [E-trademarks] Seeking help regarding affected trademark filers   Pamela Chestek
• [E-trademarks] Stationary specimen procedural question   Frances Lippincott
• [E-trademarks] Stationary specimen procedural question   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] Stationary specimen procedural question   Michael Brown
• [E-trademarks] Stationary specimen procedural question   Frances Lippincott
• [E-trademarks] Supplemental Register   Stacey Friends
• [E-trademarks] Supplemental Register   Paul Reidl
• [E-trademarks] Supplemental Register   Spencer Cross
• [E-trademarks] Supplemental Register   Stacey Friends
• [E-trademarks] T-Shirt Takedowns   Desai, Anuj
• [E-trademarks] T-Shirt Takedowns   Lara Pearson
• [E-trademarks] TEAS Sec 7 Request form - sanity check or a glitch?   Maria Eliseeva
• [E-trademarks] test email please disregard   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] the listserv is again functioning   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] the listserv is again functioning   asarabia2
• [E-trademarks] Timing of Cancellation of Mark After Abandonment   Kelcey Patrick-Ferree
• [E-trademarks] TM Search: Is The GS3 Search Field Useful?   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] TM Search: Is The GS3 Search Field Useful?   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] today's reception   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] today's reception   Justin Clark
• [E-trademarks] today's reception   Heather Balmat
• [E-trademarks] Trademark assignment form in Assignment Center   Katherine Koenig
• [E-trademarks] Trademark assignment form in Assignment Center   Orvis
• [E-trademarks] Trademark assignment form in Assignment Center   Dan Feigelson
• [E-trademarks] Trademark assignment form in Assignment Center   Carl Oppedahl
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Leesa N. Weiss
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Tim Ackermann
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Robert Pierce
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Robert Reynolds
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Leesa N. Weiss
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Todd Owers
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Leesa N. Weiss
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Examination Vent: How does this even happen?   Crane, Susan
• [E-trademarks] Trademark Search - New Version Released   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Dale Quisenberry
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Edward Timberlake
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Laura Geyer
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Cumbow, Bob
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Jaclyn Ionin
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Cumbow, Bob
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Bosland Law
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Heather Vargas
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   mrichter richtertrademarks.com
• [E-trademarks] Trademarks without vowels   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] Trade Name/Trademark Search Report Companies   Erica Bristol, Mediator
• [E-trademarks] TSDR Woes   Louis Levy - Belles Katz
• [E-trademarks] Unexpected Question Mark Occurrence - 70025285 - SOCI?T?   Ken Boone
• [E-trademarks] Uploading POA to TEAS - attorney already appointed   Katherine Koenig
• [E-trademarks] Uploading POA to TEAS - attorney already appointed   Jeff Wendt
• [E-trademarks] Use in commerce   Judith S
• [E-trademarks] Use in commerce   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] Use in commerce   Sam Castree
• [E-trademarks] Use in commerce   Judith S
• [E-trademarks] Use in commerce   Kevin Grierson
• [E-trademarks] USPQ cites?   John L. Welch
• [E-trademarks] USPQ cites?   Wheelock, Bryan
• [E-trademarks] USPQ cites?   John L. Welch
• [E-trademarks] USPQ cites?   John L. Welch
• [E-trademarks] USPTO AI Request for Comment   Mullis, David R.
• [E-trademarks] Who should sign the application?   Erica Bristol, Mediator
• [E-trademarks] Who should sign the application?   David Michaels
• [E-trademarks] Who should sign the application?   daniel at keganlaw.com
• [E-trademarks] Who should sign the application?   Orvis PC
• [E-trademarks] Who should sign the application?   Erica Bristol, Mediator
• [E-trademarks] Who should sign the application?   Gerry J. Elman
• [E-trademarks] Who should sign the application?   Erica Bristol, Mediator
• [E-trademarks] Who would like to assist with an amicus brief in support of the Chestek cert petition?   Carl Oppedahl

Last message date: Thu May 30 15:23:56 EDT 2024
Archived on: Thu May 30 15:24:19 EDT 2024

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...